Legal Opinion
James Gary Brundage v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 6, 1966No. 8721PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from a conviction and sentence on a charge of assault with a dangerous weapon in violation of 18 U.S. C. § 113(c). Jurisdiction is conceded because the alleged acts were committed upon lands within the territorial jurisdiction of the United States, i. e. a federal correctional institution.
The first complaint on appeal is that appellant was denied due process of law because the trial court refused to allow counsel to orally voir dire the prospective jurors and more particularly because of the refusal to question the prospective jurors on the subject matter of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Durham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- United States v. Donald Kenneth CurrensCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- David W. Wion v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- Ronald R. Brown v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- United States v. Thomas D. Clancy, James F. Prindable and Donald KastnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. Richard Clinton AllsupCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Don C. Silverthorne v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- United States v. David Hall and W. W. TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- United States v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. John F. GrismoreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.