Legal Opinion

United States v. Thomas D. Clancy, James F. Prindable and Donald Kastner

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided April 14, 1960No. 12815PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STECKLER, District Judge.

Thomas D. Clancy and James F. Prindable, two of the named defendants, were convicted in the district court of making a false statement of a material fact to agents of the United States Treasury Department, Internal Revenue Service, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001; of willfully attempting to evade a substantial amount of wagering excise taxes due and owing by virtue of Chapter 35, subchapter A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (26 U.S.C. § 4401), in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7201; and of conspiring to violate that subchapter, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Donald…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  3. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  5. Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Shotwell Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. David T. DellingerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
  3. Clancy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. United States v. Leonard T. Robinson, United States of America v. James E. McCaffity United States of America v. Louis JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  5. United States v. Kevin Harrison, United States of America v. Isaac Pendergrast, United States of America v. Juan GordonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API