United States v. Thomas D. Clancy, James F. Prindable and Donald Kastner
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STECKLER, District Judge.
Thomas D. Clancy and James F. Prindable, two of the named defendants, were convicted in the district court of making a false statement of a material fact to agents of the United States Treasury Department, Internal Revenue Service, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001; of willfully attempting to evade a substantial amount of wagering excise taxes due and owing by virtue of Chapter 35, subchapter A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 (26 U.S.C. § 4401), in violation of 26 U.S.C. § 7201; and of conspiring to violate that subchapter, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. Donald…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Pereira v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Shotwell Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. David T. DellingerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1973
- Clancy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United States v. Leonard T. Robinson, United States of America v. James E. McCaffity United States of America v. Louis JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- United States v. Kevin Harrison, United States of America v. Isaac Pendergrast, United States of America v. Juan GordonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.