Legal Opinion

United States v. Richard Clinton Allsup

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided December 19, 1977No. 77-1581PublishedCited by 194 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judge:

Allsup appeals from his conviction for two bank robberies (18 U.S.C. § 2113(a)), contending that multiple errors in the course of his trial denied him a fair trial. We agree with him that the cumulative errors mean that he must be tried anew.

The two bank robberies occurred in Tucson, Arizona, in October, 1976, two weeks apart. The Valley National Bank was first robbed and the First National Bank was robbed thereafter. Two factual issues dominated the proceedings: (1) Was Allsup the person who committed either or both of the robberies, and (2) did Allsup have the…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Frazier v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. United States v. NellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  5. United States v. Leonard T. Robinson, United States of America v. James E. McCaffity United States of America v. Louis JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by194 opinions

  1. United States v. Sean HowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Heriberto Rodriguez v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. Alfred R. Dyer v. Arthur Calderon, Warden, of California State Prison at San QuentinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. Robert E. CapuaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. People v. LedesmaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006

189 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API