Legal Opinion

Dudley v. Ferguson Trucking Company

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1956No. 5934PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McGHEE, Justice.

The defendants, employer and insurer, appeal from a judgment of the district court awarding claimant, employee, workmen’s compensation benefits.

Claimant sustained a compensable injury when he was helping to load oil well drilling equipment on a truck. A drill collar rolled off a flat bed and struck his right, foot. It was necessary that the great toe on this foot be amputated through the proximal portion of the first phalanx. Claimant was hospitalized at Farmington, New Mexico, in excess of two and one-half months, during which time four operations were performed on his foot.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lipe v. BradburyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1945
  2. George v. Miller & Smith, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Mathews v. New Mexico Light & Power Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Gonzales v. Pecos Valley Packing Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Lentz v. Mumy Well ServiceMichigan Supreme Court · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Garcia v. Genuine Parts Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Baca v. Bueno FoodsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Beckwith v. Cactus Drilling CorporationNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Cardenas v. United Nuclear Homestake PartnersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Waldroop v. Driver-Miller Plumbing & Heating Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API