Legal Opinion

Waldroop v. Driver-Miller Plumbing & Heating Corp.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1956No. 5951PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIKER, Justice.

This is a claim brought under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The claimant alleged that he was injured while lifting a plumbing unit; that the injury was to his back and that he suffered total permanent disability; that he had incurred, up to the time of filing his claim, medical expenses in excess of $700; and that his earnings before the injury were $100 per week.

Answering, defendants denied all material allegations stated in plaintiff’s claim.

The verdict of the jury was for total temporary disability for a number of weeks and for 40% permanent partial disability for the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Schulz v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Groat v. Walkup Drayage & Warehouse Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  3. Texas Employers' Ins. Ass'n v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Holmes v. Terminal RR Ass'n of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  5. State v. FernandezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1952

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Beahm v. ShortallCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. Sauter v. St. Michael's CollegeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Hamilton v. DotyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Seal v. Blackburn Tank Truck ServiceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Alvillar v. HatfieldNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1971

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API