Legal Opinion

Beckwith v. Cactus Drilling Corporation

New Mexico Court of Appeals

Decided November 30, 1972No. 930PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOOD, Chief Judge.

Beckwith suffered two accidents arising out of and in the course of his employment. The respective defendants — Cactus (Cactus Drilling Corporation and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company) and McVay (McVay Drilling Corporation and Reliance Insurance Company) — appeal from a judgment in favor of Beckwith. The issues concern: (1) actual knowledge of injury; (2) partial disability; and (3) liability for medical treatment.

Actual knowledge of injury.

The trial court found, as to each of the claims, that the respective defendants had actual knowledge, within thirty days, of the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Woods v. BrumlopNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Cervantes v. ForbisNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Reynolds v. Ruidoso Racing Association, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Bettini v. City of Las CrucesNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Lyon v. Catron County CommissionersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Herman v. Miners' HospitalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Herndon v. Albuquerque Public SchoolsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. Moorhead v. Gray Ranch Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Dutton v. McKinley County Board of CommissionersNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Gonzales v. Stanke-Brown & Associates, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1982

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API