Legal Opinion

Anaya v. City of Santa Fe

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1969No. 8166PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TACKETT, Justice.

Plaintiff-appellant Juan D. Anaya, designated as “plaintiff,” filed a claim for workmen’s compensation against defendants-appellees The City of Santa Fe, employer, and Houston Fire and Casualty Insurance Company, insurer, designated as “defendants,” for an injury received on April 11, 1957, while employed in the refuse department of the City. The complaint was filed on January 31, 1964, some six years and nine months subsequent to the date of the injury. The case was submitted to the trial court upon a stipulation that evidence would be received bearing on the statute…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Herrera v. C & R PAVING COMPANYNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Hudson v. Herschbach Drilling Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Tocci v. Albuquerque & Cerrillos Coal Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Winter v. Roberson Construction CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Morris v. RossNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Security Insurance Co. of Hartford v. ChapmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Segura v. Molycorp, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Malone v. Swift Fresh Meats Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Garza v. W. A. Jourdan, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 1977
  5. Sanchez v. Memorial General HospitalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API