United States v. Private E1 RONALD GRAY
Army Court of Criminal Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT AND ACTION ON PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT OF CORAM NOBIS
JOHNSON, Senior Judge:
This is a petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of coram nobis based on several alleged errors discovered after petitioner’s court-martial and appellate proceedings. We hold that petitioner cannot meet the threshold criteria for coram nobis review. Petitioner has other remedies available to him as a matter of law, but not within the military justice system.
I
In 1988, petitioner was tried by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- United States v. DenedoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Denedo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
- Loving v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
- Loving v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. ChapmanUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
- United States v. Private RONALD GRAYArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
- Anderson v. BolsterDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2020
- Gray v. PayneDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021
- In Re. JordanNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.