Legal Opinion

United States v. Private E1 RONALD GRAY

Army Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided January 26, 2012No. ARMY MISC 20110093PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT AND ACTION ON PETITION FOR EXTRAORDINARY RELIEF IN THE NATURE OF A WRIT OF CORAM NOBIS

JOHNSON, Senior Judge:

This is a petition for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of coram nobis based on several alleged errors discovered after petitioner’s court-martial and appellate proceedings. We hold that petitioner cannot meet the threshold criteria for coram nobis review. Petitioner has other remedies available to him as a matter of law, but not within the military justice system.

I

In 1988, petitioner was tried by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. United States v. DenedoSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Denedo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
  4. Loving v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2005
  5. Loving v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. ChapmanUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
  2. United States v. Private RONALD GRAYArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2017
  3. Anderson v. BolsterDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2020
  4. Gray v. PayneDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2021
  5. In Re. JordanNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API