Loving v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Judge GIERKE
delivered the opinion of the Court.
I. INTRODUCTION
There are two issues before this Court now: (1) whether we have jurisdiction to entertain Petitioner’s assertions of error as to the legality of his death sentence; and (2) if so, whether his two petitions seeking a writ of coram nobis properly present these challenges here. More precisely, the first critical question is whether this Court has jurisdiction over this military death penalty case in the period after “there is a final judgment as to the legality of the proceedings” under Article 71(c)(1), 1 but before the case is…
2Cases cited82 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- Denedo v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
- United States v. WiseCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
- Ortiz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2018
- Loving v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
- United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.