Legal Opinion
Oxbow Carbon & Minerals, LLC v. Department of Industrial Relations
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 24, 2011No. B219504PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BOREN, P. J.
Oxbow Carbon & Minerals, LLC, appeals from a judgment denying its petition for writ of mandate. The petition for writ of mandate followed an adverse administrative ruling by respondents State of California, Department of Industrial Relations (Department or DIR), and its director, John C. Duncan (Director). The Director found that work performed under two separate contracts constituted “public works” pursuant to Labor Code section 1720 because the work was paid for in part out of public funds, and it was therefore subject to California’s prevailing wage law.1 The trial court…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- DaFonte v. Up-Right, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1992
- Morris v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Culligan Water Conditioning of Bellflower, Inc. v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Lusardi Construction Co. v. AubryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Castillo v. Toll Bros., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2011
- Cinema W., LLC v. Baker, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- John Busker v. Wabtec Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Busker v. WabtecCalifornia Supreme Court · 2021
- Cinema West v. BakerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.