Legal Opinion
Peare v. McFarland
District Court, N.D. Indiana
Decided January 6, 1984No. S 83-69PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
ALLEN SHARP, Chief Judge.
This case is now before the court on cross-motions for summary judgment of plaintiff, Harry S. Peare, and defendant-in tervenor, United States Department of Labor (DOL). The sole issue addressed in these motions is whether 26 U.S.C.A. § 3304(a)(15)(A)(i) of the Federal Unemployment Tax Act, 26 U.S.C. § 3304(a)(15)(A)(i) (§ (A)(i)), permits the defendant, Indiana Employment Security Division (IESD), to reduce the unemployment benefits of Social Security recipients whose benefits vested as the result of prior work performed for a non-base period…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Justin Rone, United States of America v. Roy Dupont LittleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Lawrence Cabais v. Roscoe Egger, Commissioner of the Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Edwards v. ValdezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Watkins v. CantrellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Bowman v. StumboCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Ferrari v. Barclays American/Business Credit, Inc. (In Re Morse Tool, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1988
- Edwards v. ValdezDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.