Legal Opinion

GROSSMAN CHEVROLET COMPANY v. Enockson

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1957No. 7583PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BURKE, Judge.

We think the nature of this case can best be stated by setting forth the complaint at length. It is as follows:

"1. That the plaintiff is now and was at all times hereinafter mentioned a foreign corporation.
“2. On or about October 8th, 1954, plaintiff loaned to defendant, Herbert A. Enock-son, for one day a 1951 two-door Chevrolet car, under a written agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit ‘A’ and made a part hereof.
“3. In breach of said agreement, defendant Enockson failed to return said car at the expiration of the said day or at any time thereafter.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bresnick v. HeathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  2. Kinnischtzke v. City of Glen UllinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Wicklund v. North Star Timber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  4. Iverson v. TweedenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Sleeper v. BakerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States Fire Ins. v. Paramount Fur Service, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API