Legal Opinion
GROSSMAN CHEVROLET COMPANY v. Enockson
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided December 9, 1957No. 7583PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
BURKE, Judge.
We think the nature of this case can best be stated by setting forth the complaint at length. It is as follows:
"1. That the plaintiff is now and was at all times hereinafter mentioned a foreign corporation.
“2. On or about October 8th, 1954, plaintiff loaned to defendant, Herbert A. Enock-son, for one day a 1951 two-door Chevrolet car, under a written agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto, marked Exhibit ‘A’ and made a part hereof.
“3. In breach of said agreement, defendant Enockson failed to return said car at the expiration of the said day or at any time thereafter.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bresnick v. HeathMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Kinnischtzke v. City of Glen UllinNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1953
- Wicklund v. North Star Timber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Iverson v. TweedenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1951
- Sleeper v. BakerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1911
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States Fire Ins. v. Paramount Fur Service, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1959