Legal Opinion

Reed v. Hill

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 26, 1955No. 8 Div. 726PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMPSON, Justice.

This is a petition for a writ of mandamus by Reed, who was the plaintiff in a tort action against one Howell in the Law and Equity Court of Franklin County. The tort action grew out of a collision of motor vehicles.

Universal Underwriters Insurance Company filed a bill in equity for a declaratory judgment to determine whether or not it was liable as insurance carrier of Howell. The issues as finally developed, by bill and answer, seem to be whether or not Howell notified the Company of a substitution of vehicles or whether or not the requirement of such notice was waived.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. George v. Employers' Liability Assur. CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  2. Tuscaloosa County v. ShamblinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  3. MacEy v. CrumSupreme Court of Alabama · 1947
  4. Goodman v. Georgia Life Ins.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1914

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Holloway v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  2. Hanks v. HanksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
  3. Ex Parte RushSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  4. Madison County. Board of Education v. WigleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1972
  5. Ex Parte MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API