Legal Opinion

Holloway v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 28, 1979No. 77-739PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs have appealed from an adverse judgment of the Circuit Court. We reverse.

The appellee, Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company (hereinafter referred to as Nationwide), insured certain vehicles belonging to one of the appellants, Moses and Holloway Heating and Air Conditioning Company, Inc. (hereinafter Moses Holloway) under a "fleet policy." Moses Holloway, an Alabama corporation is the named insured in this fleet policy. The appellant M.R. Holloway owned over 95% of the stock of this corporation and his wife owned the rest of the stock.

On May 1, 1975, Paul Edward Holloway, the son…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Farm Automobile Insurance Co. v. ReavesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  2. Lambert v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1976
  3. Billups v. Ala. Farm Bur. Mut. Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  4. Reed v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
  5. General Mutual Insurance Company v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Utica Mutual Insurance v. ContriscianeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Nationwide Insurance v. GodeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Thompson v. GRANGE INSURANCECourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  4. Harris v. MageeMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Jaramillo v. Providence Washington InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API