Legal Opinion
Dorchy v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 25, 1999No. Civil Action 96-2753 AKPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KAY, United States Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff Charles A. Dorchy sued Defendant Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), claiming violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and of section 794 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1978 (“Rehabilitation Act”), 29 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. The case is before this Court for all purposes, including trial, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 502. Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the Complaint and/or for Summary Judgment [32]. 1…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Etim U. Aka v. Washington Hospital CenterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lester v. NatsiosDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Richard v. Bell Atlantic Corp.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Noel v. Elk Brand Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 2000
- Moore v. AshcroftDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- McManus v. WilliamsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.