Legal Opinion

Hemingway v. Cozzolino

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 7, 1933PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Testimony by plaintiff that she suffered pains in her knees, elbows and ankles beginning about a year before the trial was objected to on the ground that no connection of these symptoms with the accident had been shown, but was admitted upon a promise that the relation would be established subsequently, which promise was not complied with. Error is assigned in that the trial court did not instruct the jury to disregard this evidence. No request for such instruction was made. The evidence doubtless would have been stricken out if motion therefor had been made, and this would have been…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Antel v. PoliSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  2. Standard Cement Co. v. Windham National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bonczkiewicz v. Merberg Wrecking Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  2. Gigliotti v. United Illuminating Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
  3. Scott, Admr. v. Bradford National BankSupreme Court of Vermont · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API