Scott, Admr. v. Bradford National Bank
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtPowers, C. J.
The plaintiff as administrator de bonis non of Laura B. Dickey, brings this action to recover the amount of a deposit which the intestate once had in the defendant bank. The answer set up a general denial, payment, and estoppel. The trial below was by jury, and at the close of the evidence both parties moved for a verdict. The defendant’s motion was overruled and the plaintiff’s granted. Judgment was rendered accordingly, and the defendant excepted.
We agree with the defendant that the fact that both parties moved for a A^erdict did not, alone, warrant a directed verdict one way or the other.…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Stevens v. GaylordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
- Kennedy v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- Beall v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Winship v. BassMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815
- Foote v. FooteMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bacon, Receiver v. BarberSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
- Collier v. NolanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
- Levin v. Northwestern National BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- State v. MoquinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1944
- Taylor v. BlakeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.