Legal Opinion

Scott, Admr. v. Bradford National Bank

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 7, 1935PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPowers, C. J.

The plaintiff as administrator de bonis non of Laura B. Dickey, brings this action to recover the amount of a deposit which the intestate once had in the defendant bank. The answer set up a general denial, payment, and estoppel. The trial below was by jury, and at the close of the evidence both parties moved for a verdict. The defendant’s motion was overruled and the plaintiff’s granted. Judgment was rendered accordingly, and the defendant excepted.

We agree with the defendant that the fact that both parties moved for a A^erdict did not, alone, warrant a directed verdict one way or the other.…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Stevens v. GaylordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
  2. Kennedy v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. Beall v. New MexicoSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  4. Winship v. BassMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1815
  5. Foote v. FooteMichigan Supreme Court · 1886

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bacon, Receiver v. BarberSupreme Court of Vermont · 1939
  2. Collier v. NolanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1965
  3. Levin v. Northwestern National BankSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. State v. MoquinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1944
  5. Taylor v. BlakeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API