Legal Opinion
Routed Thru-Pac, Inc. v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided October 18, 1968No. 384-64PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DURFEE, Judge.
There are two causes of action in this case: (1) A claim for the transportation charges which plaintiff says it is entitled to under Items 15 and 145 of Military Basic Tender No. 1, relating to the movement into and out of storage-in-transit, and (2) A claim for transportation charges under Item 150 of Military Basic Tender No. 1, relating to the diversion or reconsignment of shipments.
We hold that plaintiff is not entitled to compensation for both movement into and out of storage-in-transit under the applicable Items of Military -Basic Tender No. 1 for reasons to be…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Dan Smoot v. Honorable Noel P. Fox, United States District Judge for the Western District of MichiganCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- United States v. Isthmian Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Bishop Engineering Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Aero Mayflower Transit Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1963
- Guy M. Beaty, Sr., and Cross-Appellants v. Brock & Blevins Company, Inc., and Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Northern Helex Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Wainwright Securities Inc. v. Wall Street Transcript Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- Trans Ocean Van Service v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- American Fidelity Fire Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Sheridan v. FoxDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.