Aero Mayflower Transit Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Per curiam
This case was referred pursuant to Rule 37(e) to Saul Richard Gamer, a trial commissioner of this court, with directions to make his recommendation for conclusions of law on plaintiffs’ motion and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment. The commissioner has done so in an opinion filed March 4, 1963, wherein he recommended that plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment be granted, with the amounts of their recoveries to be determined pursuant to Rule 38(c), and defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment be denied. It appears to the court that plaintiffs have failed to file a request…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Gulf Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Union Wire Rope Corporation v. Atchison, T. & SF Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1933
- Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Atlantic Bridge Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
- A. E. West Petroleum Co. v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954
- Southern Pac. Co. v. LothropCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Hol-Gar Manufacturing Corp. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- ITT Arctic Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1975
- Southern Construction Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Dittmore-Freimuth Corp. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Dana Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.