Moot v. Searle
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
Action to recover compensation for personal services. Judgment was entered against defendant by default and he appeals from the order denying his motion to relieve him from the default, vacate the judgment and permit him to answer. The affidavits against the motion indicate that defendant has had much experience as a de-. fendant in civil cases, and as a result possesses much more information concerning the service of a summons than he admits in his own affidavits. The showing for plaintiff indicates that when this service was made upon defendant he knew perfectly well what was happening.
Accor…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Whipple v. MahlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Hill v. TischerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- City of St. Paul v. MeisterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- In Re Estate of KeesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Whipple v. MahlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943