Legal Opinion · Dissent

Whipple v. Mahler

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 6, 1943No. 33,381Published

1DissentJulius J. Olson, Justice

There is but one question for decision here — whether the trial court erred in refusing defendants’ motion for opening a default judgment against both of them and for leave to answer.

The action was brought to recover attorney’s fees claimed to have been earned in a divorce action. In his complaint plaintiff alleges that “on and between April 9, 1935 and July 23, 1938, said plaintiff, at the special instance and request of defendant Evelyn Mahler performed professional services for her in procuring a divorce from the defendant, William Mahler”; that “said services rendered were of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Isensee Motors v. RandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  2. Moot v. SearleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Lentz v. LutzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API