Legal Opinion

Grandy v. Southern Pacific Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 10, 1935No. Civ. 10405PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCOMB, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants entered after the trial court granted defendants’ motion for a directed verdict.

Viewing the evidence most favorably to plaintiff (Newson v. Hawley, 205 Cal. 188, 189 [270 Pac. 364]), the facts in the instant case are:

That plaintiff was struck by a box ear propelled by a. switch engine which was backing across a driveway-sidewalk on a curve in a northeasterly direction on Alameda Street in the city of Los Angeles. Plaintiff was pursuing a route, followed by him over a period of five years, west on Bay Street to the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Green v. Los Angeles Terminal Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Hamlin v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Koch v. Southern California Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Newson v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Chrissinger v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Stroud v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Bickford v. LawsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. Flores v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1936
  4. MacDonnell v. California Lands Inc.California Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Abrams v. HubertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API