Grandy v. Southern Pacific Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
McCOMB, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of defendants entered after the trial court granted defendants’ motion for a directed verdict.
Viewing the evidence most favorably to plaintiff (Newson v. Hawley, 205 Cal. 188, 189 [270 Pac. 364]), the facts in the instant case are:
That plaintiff was struck by a box ear propelled by a. switch engine which was backing across a driveway-sidewalk on a curve in a northeasterly direction on Alameda Street in the city of Los Angeles. Plaintiff was pursuing a route, followed by him over a period of five years, west on Bay Street to the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Green v. Los Angeles Terminal Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
- Hamlin v. Pacific Electric Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1907
- Koch v. Southern California Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Newson v. HawleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Chrissinger v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Stroud v. HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Bickford v. LawsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Flores v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- MacDonnell v. California Lands Inc.California Supreme Court · 1940
- Abrams v. HubertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.