Legal Opinion

Malletier v. Dooney & Bourke, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 30, 2008No. 04 Civ. 2990(SAS)PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This action has pitted two prominent handbag manufacturers against each other and mired them in seemingly endless and often contentious litigation for nearly four years. Plaintiff Louis Yuitton Malletier (“Louis Vuitton”) claims that defendant Dooney & Bourke, Inc. (“Dooney & Bourke” or “Dooney”) violated federal and state law by introducing and selling handbags bearing designs that infringe upon and dilute Louis Vuitton’s trademark rights. Following the conclusion of extensive fact and expert discovery, Dooney & Bourke now…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Hypnotic Hats, Ltd. v. Wintermantel Enters., LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018
  2. LVL XIII Brands, Inc. v. Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
  3. New World Solutions, Inc. v. NameMedia Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
  4. Coty Inc. v. Excell Brands, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017
  5. Louis Vuitton Mallatier S.A. v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API