Legal Opinion

Louis Vuitton Mallatier S.A. v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 15, 2012No. 11 Civ. 9436(ALC)(HBP)PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION & ORDER

ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., District Judge.

On December 22, 2011, Louis Vuitton Malletier, S.A. (“Louis Vuitton”) filed a *174complaint against Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc. (“Warner Bros.”), focusing on Warner Bros.’ use of a travel bag in the film “The Hangover: Part II” that allegedly infringes upon Louis Vuitton’s trademarks. Plaintiffs complaint asserts three claims for relief: (1) false designation of origin/unfair competition in violation of § 43(a) of the Lanham Act; (2) common law unfair competition; and (3) trademark dilution in violation N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law 360-i. On March…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Chambers v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  4. DiFolco v. MSNBC Cable L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
  5. Inwood Laboratories, Inc. v. Ives Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Kaplan, Inc. v. YunDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2014
  2. Stevo Design, Inc. v. SBR Marketing Ltd.District Court, D. Nevada · 2013
  3. Vans, Inc. v. MSCHF Product Studio, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2023
  4. Jack Daniel's Properties, Inc. v. VIP Products LLCSupreme Court of the United States · 2023
  5. Roberts v. BlissDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2017

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API