Legal Opinion

Hypnotic Hats, Ltd. v. Wintermantel Enters., LLC

District Court, S.D. Illinois

Decided September 28, 2018No. 1:15-CV-06478 (ALC)PublishedCited by 78 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDREW L. CARTER, JR., United States District Judge:

*578Plaintiff Hypnotic Hats, Ltd. ("Hyp"), a corporation that sells socks and athletic bras in connection with its HYP trademark, is engaged in a trademark dispute with Wintermantel Enterprises, LLC ("Wintermantel Enter."), Hype Socks, LLC ("Hype Socks"), and Hype Cheer, LLC ("Hype Cheer") (together, "Defendants"), companies that have sold socks and athletic bras bearing the HYPE SOCKS and HYPE CHEER marks. Plaintiff contends that the HYPE marks infringe on its HYP trademark, while Defendants claim that the marks are not confusingly similar and…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Hicks v. BainesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. AM General LLC v. Activision Blizzard, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2020
  2. AT&T Enterprises, LLC v. Atos IT Solutions and Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2025
  3. AngioDynamics, Inc. v. C.R. Bard, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 2021
  4. Bossuk v. Augusta Sportswear, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022
  5. Bossuk v. Augusta Sportswear, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2022

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API