Legal Opinion
Coleco Industries, Inc. v. Kransco Manufacturing, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 10, 1965PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TENNEY, District Judge.
Defendant moves herein, pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to dismiss the complaint for improper venue under Section 1400(b) of Title 28 of the United States Code or, in the alternative, to transfer the action to the district where venue is more properly laid.
It is not disputed that defendant is a California corporation and is not a resident of this district; accordingly, venue can be laid in this district only if it be shown that an act of infringement was committed here, and that defendant has a regular and established place of business in…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Goldlawr, Inc. v. HeimanSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Fourco Glass Co. v. Transmirra Products Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Stonite Products Co. v. Melvin Lloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Schnell v. Peter Eckrich & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- W. S. Tyler Co. v. Ludlow-Saylor Wire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stanley Works v. Globemaster, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1975
- Ruddies v. Auburn Spark Plug Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Ipco Hospital Supply Corp. v. Les Fils D'Auguste Maillefer S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
- San Shoe Trading Corp. v. Converse Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Rains v. Cascade Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.