Mavrolas v. Gregory
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWinboRne, C. J.
Much has been written on the law pertaining to the subject of this action. Hawes v. Refining Co., 236 N.C. 643, 74 S.E. 2d 17; Matheny v. Coach Co., 233 N.C. 673, 65 S.E. 2d 361; Batchelor v. Black, 232 N.C. 314, 59 S.E. 2d 817; and on petition to rehear 232 N.C. 745, 61 S.E. 2d 894; Badders v. Lassiter, 240 N.C. 413, 82 S.E. 2d 357; Jackson v. McCoury, 247 N.C. 502, 101 S.E. 2d 377 and others.
But conceding, as is done for the purpose of this appeal, that the evidence taken in the light most favorable to plaintiff makes out a prima facie case of actionable negligence against the defendants,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Matheny v. Central Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Badders v. LassiterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Hawes v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Gore v. Columbus CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Jackson v. McCourySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.