Legal Opinion

Schuenemeyer v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 6, 1984No. 329-81CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT and PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO TRANSFER

WHITE, Senior Judge.

In this unusual case, the defendant has asked the court to enter judgment in the favor of the plaintiff, and the plaintiff has objected.

The defendant’s motion is called a motion for summary judgment. Strictly speaking, under the rules of the court, a motion for summary judgment can be allowed only in a situation where the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. See Rule 56(c). Consequently, the defendant’s motion will be treated as a motion for the entry of judgment in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Brenner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  3. Robert A. Muldonian v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ayala v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
  2. Laningham v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  3. Voge v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  4. Schuenemeyer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  5. Consortium Venture Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API