Legal Opinion

Voge v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided January 16, 1987No. 244-86CPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

NETTESHEIM, Judge.

This case is before the court after argument on defendant’s motion for partial summary judgment and plaintiff’s cross-motion for summary judgment. Three issues have been raised: 1) whether this court can review the decision to terminate additional special pay (“ASP”) to which a servicemember is entitled absent its termination; 2) whether officer fitness reports (“OFR’s”) need only be fair and legal when they are used in connection with promotion determinations and not ASP determinations; and 3) whether a court’s review of these OFR’s includes examining the underlying…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Sanders v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
  5. Hary v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Victoria M. Voge v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  2. Bishop v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
  3. Long v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  4. Cohn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1988
  5. Webster v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API