Legal Opinion

Ayala v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 4, 1988No. 441-87CPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HARKINS, Senior Judge.

This case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to RUSCC 12(b)(1), for lack of jurisdiction over the subject matter, and RUSCC 12(b)(4), failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Plaintiff’s complaint seeks retroactive promotion, back pay, medical benefits and damages arising from a transfer from the Selected Marine Corps Reserves (SMCR) (reservists drilling and receiving pay) to the Independent Ready Reserves (IRR) (reservists in billets for which pay is not authorized). Plaintiff’s claim for back pay clearly is within the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Brown v. General Services AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Feres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. United States v. KingSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Dehne v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
  2. Richard A. Banks v. H. Lawrence Garrett, Iii, Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
  3. Lee v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1995
  4. Reeves v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
  5. Laningham v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API