Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Johnson
Montana Supreme Court
Decided November 5, 1932No. 6,940PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews
The plaintiffs, Alfred and Victor Johnson, have appealed from a judgment of dismissal entered in an action instituted by them against the assessor, the treasurer, and the board' of county commissioners of Granite county, and the State Board of Equalization, to recover the amount, paid under protest, as taxes on certain lands for the year 1930. The judgment was entered after defendants’ general demurrer to the complaint had been sustained and plaintiffs had declined to further plead; it recites that all proceedings in eleven like cases are stayed awaiting the disposition of this appeal.
The…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Londoner v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Los Angeles Gas & Electric Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Hammond Lumber Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- State v. State Board of EqualizationMontana Supreme Court · 1919
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Snidow v. State Board of EqualizationMontana Supreme Court · 1932
- Bailey v. Iowa Beef Processors, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Olsen v. Public Service CommissionMontana Supreme Court · 1955
- Board of County Com'rs v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1953
- Thompson v. Tobacco Root Co-Op. State Grazing DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1948
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.