Atlantic & Pacific Rld. v. Reisner
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Atohison District Court. Reisner had judgment against the Railroad. Company, and one Hyde, at the November Term 1875, and the Railroad Company brings the case here on error.
Read the full summary
Error from Atohison District Court. Reisner had judgment against the Railroad. Company, and one Hyde, at the November Term 1875, and the Railroad Company brings the case here on error. The record discloses the fact, that after the issue was joined in the court below, a receiver was appointed for the Railroad Company, and that the affairs and management of said company passed into the hands of such receiver; that thereby the power and authority of the company’s attorney ceased, and that no action was taken by or on the part of the receiver to protect the interests of the railroad company until…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Horton, C. J.:
In the trial in the district court, it appeared that this action was brought by Reisner, defendant in error, a hotel-keeper, against one H. Hyde, and the Atlantic & Pacific railroad company to recover $104, and interest, for board, room, and lodging furnished to one William Hurdle, a disabled employé of the railroad company, from April 2d to May 1st 1873, at two dollars per day, and also for the services of an attendant for nineteen days at one dollar per day, and for certain bandages of the value of three dollars. The following is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. RodriguesIllinois Supreme Court · 1868
- Marquette & Ontonagon Railroad v. TaftMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
- Tucker v. St. Louis, Kansas City & Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1873
- Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. PrinceIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
- Stephenson v. New York & Harlem RailroadThe Superior Court of New York City · 1853
3Cited by40 opinions
- Indianapolis, Peru & Chicago Railway Co. v. PitzerIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Great West Min. Co. v. Woodmas of Alston Min. Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1888
- Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. McMurrayIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Sealy Oil Mill & Mfg. Co. v. Bishop Mfg. Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1921
- Louisville, Evansville & St. Louis Railway Co. v. McVayIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.