Legal Opinion
Collins Tuttle & Co. v. Colgate Palmolive Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 21, 1982PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
opinion of the court
Richard W. Wallach, J.
This motion by defendants for summary judgment, essentially on the ground that plaintiff’s claim is barred by the failure of its two officer brokers (Emma and Leff) to be licensed in New Jersey, is denied.
Plaintiff Collins Tuttle Co., Inc. (Collins) is a multi-State brokerage organization which at all pertinent times was licensed as a broker in New Jersey as well as in New York. The same cannot be said of Messrs. Emma and Leff. Although fully licensed in New York as brokers, they only satisfied New Jersey’s formal licensing requirements after all of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Auten v. AutenNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Intercontinental Planning, Ltd. v. Daystrom Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Keviczky v. LorberNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Galbreath-Ruffin Corp. v. 40th & 3rd Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Bendell v. De DominicisNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Madison Realty, Inc. v. NeissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- NFS Services, Inc. v. West 73rd Street AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Rogovin v. Bach Realty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Interglobal Realty Corp. v. American Standard Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Philip Mehler Realty, Inc. v. KayserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991