NFS Services, Inc. v. West 73rd Street Associates
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Kassal, J.
The issue on this appeal is whether a real estate broker, licensed in the State of New Jersey but not in New York, may recover for brokerage services rendered in this State.
On February 28, 1979, West 73rd Street Associates (Associates), the owner of 11 Riverside Drive in Manhattan, entered into a letter agreement whereby Associates agreed to pay M. L. Schultz Co. 10% of the profits derived “when, as and if earned by Associates from and upon conversion or sale of the premises if Associates makes a deal concerning these Premises with your client.” The *389agreement…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Roman v. LobeNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Galbreath-Ruffin Corp. v. 40th & 3rd Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1967
- Bendell v. De DominicisNew York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Gerstein v. 532 Broad Hollow Road Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Eaton Associates v. Highland Broadcasting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ashton General Partnership, Inc. v. Federal Data Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
- NFS Services, Inc. v. West 73rd Street AssociatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Philip Mehler Realty, Inc. v. KayserAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Lyons & Associates, Inc. v. 16 East 48th Street Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1996
- New England Retail Properties, Inc. v. Commerce Park Associates 11, LLC.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.