Legal Opinion

Shelby County, Alabama v. Holder

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 16, 2010No. Civil Action No. 2010-0651PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.

Shelby County has sued Attorney General Eric Holder, seeking a declaratory judgment that Sections 4(b) and 5 of the Voting Rights Act (“VRA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 1973b(b) and 1973c, are unconstitutional. Shortly after filing its complaint, Shelby County moved for summary judgment. The United States, as well as defendant-intervenors — a civil rights organization and a number of individuals— ask the Court to deny the motion as premature, or in the alternative to grant discovery pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(f). 1 The Court…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Kimel v. Florida Board of RegentsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Tennessee v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Nevada Department of Human Resources v. HibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Doe v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Herbert v. Architect of the CapitolDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  2. SHELBY COUNTY ALA. v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  3. Briggs v. YiDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2023
  4. Fund Texas Choice v. PaxtonDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2023
  5. Shelby County, Alabama v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API