Legal Opinion

Doe v. Reed

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 24, 2010No. 09-559PublishedCited by 403 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION OF THE COURT

[561 U.S. 190]

2Opinion of the Court · RobertsChief Justice Roberts

The State of Washington allows its citizens to challenge state laws by referendum. Roughly four percent of Washington voters must sign a petition to place such a referendum on the ballot. That petition, which by law must include the

[561 U.S. 191]

names and addresses of the signers, is then submitted to the government for verification and canvassing, to ensure that only lawful signatures are counted. The Washington Public Records Act (PRA) authorizes private parties to obtain copies of government documents, and the State construes the PRA to cover submitted…

3Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. United States v. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by403 opinions

  1. Rhonda Ezell v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  2. Bucklew v. PrecytheSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
  3. American Civil Liberties Union of Ill. v. AlvarezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  4. Dennis Fusaro v. Michael CoganCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
  5. Kendall v. BalcerzakCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011

398 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API