Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Robarts

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 18, 1929No. Docket No. 3915PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

PRESTON (H. L.), J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs, C. M. Holmes and Susan M. Holmes, from a judgment of nonsuit entered against them in an action for rescission. The appeal is upon the judgment-roll alone.

The pleadings set forth these facts: Plaintiffs allege in their original and supplemental complaint that on January 22, 1927, they purchased from defendant Vincent 0. Rob-arts a grocery business, store fixtures and equipment, etc., located in the city of Redondo Beach, California, paying therefor the full purchase price of $1,775, and as part of the same transaction plaintiffs…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Phillips v. StarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Rayfield v. Van MeterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Archer v. HarveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Tomboy Gold & Copper Co. v. MarksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Newell v. E. B. & A. L. Stone Co.California Supreme Court · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pacific Odorite Corp. v. GershCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API