Holmes v. Robarts
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
PRESTON (H. L.), J., pro tem.
This is an appeal by plaintiffs, C. M. Holmes and Susan M. Holmes, from a judgment of nonsuit entered against them in an action for rescission. The appeal is upon the judgment-roll alone.
The pleadings set forth these facts: Plaintiffs allege in their original and supplemental complaint that on January 22, 1927, they purchased from defendant Vincent 0. Rob-arts a grocery business, store fixtures and equipment, etc., located in the city of Redondo Beach, California, paying therefor the full purchase price of $1,775, and as part of the same transaction plaintiffs…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Phillips v. StarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Rayfield v. Van MeterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Archer v. HarveyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Tomboy Gold & Copper Co. v. MarksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Newell v. E. B. & A. L. Stone Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pacific Odorite Corp. v. GershCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949