Legal Opinion

Humes v. Kramer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 18, 1926No. Appeal, 15PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ms. Justice Sadler,

The plaintiff, Miss Humes, took possession and control of her father’s farm, which had been devised for her benefit during life, or so long as she remained unmarried. In 1921, the owner of the adjoining land, Kramer, leased his property to an oil company, personally pointing out the boundaries of the tract, and it drilled an oil well. Surveys showed this to be located on plaintiff’s side of the line, and, after notice of the alleged trespass was given, an action was instituted to recover damages sustained. There was no denial of ownership by the Humes estate of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Lauderbach-Zerby Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Piper v. QueeneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Richmond v. BennettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
  4. Crawford v. Forest Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
  5. Pile v. PedrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Rice v. HillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  2. Schwartz v. Manufacturers' Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Potts Run Coal Co. v. Benjamin Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Burkholder v. Westmoreland County Institution DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  5. Consolidation Coal Co. v. FriedlineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API