Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Dumas

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 18, 2000No. 1990970PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Dumas and Mae Dumas petition for a writ of mandamus directing the trial court to vacate its order granting the defendant Melanie Wise discovery concerning the Dumases' medical records, through the use of several nonparty subpoenas. We deny the petition.

The Dumases sued Wise to recover for injuries sustained in an automobile accident that, they allege, was negligently caused by Wise, the driver of the vehicle with which their vehicle collided. In their complaint, David Dumas claims he suffered an injury to his knee as a result of the accident, and Mae Dumas claims she suffered injuries…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ex Parte McNaughtonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  2. Ex Parte Compass BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  3. Ex Parte Mobile Fixture & Equipment Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  4. Ex Parte ClarkeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Ex Parte AMI West Alabama General Hosp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carlisle v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  2. Ex Parte Alabama Bd. of Pardons and ParolesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  3. Ex Parte McFadden Engineering, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  4. County of Tuscaloosa v. LamoreauxSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API