Hork v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Stone, Justice.
In this action for personal injuries, plaintiff had a verdict. Defendant’s alternative motion for judgment notwithstanding or a new trial was denied upon condition that plaintiff consent to a reduction. That consent was given, and defendant appeals.
Plaintiff was injured while riding in a truck which was run into from the rear by one of defendant’s street cars. There was evidence for plaintiff that the truck was standing at the time. There was opposing testimony for defendant that the truck suddenly and without warning checked its speed or stopped on the track and in front of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Holmes v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Dyas v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Vogel v. D. M. Osborne & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
- Tisdale v. President of the Delaware & Hudson Canal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Carpenter v. Tri-State Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Thomson v. BolesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- Carlson v. FredsallSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949