State of Minnesota v. Somsalao Thonesavanh
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TOUSSAINT, Judge. *
In this pretrial prosecution appeal, appellant State of Minnesota argues that the district court erred by granting respondent defendant’s motion to dismiss the charge of theft of a motor vehicle for lack of probable cause. The state argues that the district court’s decision was based on an erroneous interpretation of Minn,Stat. § 609.52, subd. 2(a)(17). We affirm.
FACTS
At approximately 4:51 a.m. on December 29, 2014, J.V. called the local law enforcement dispatch center to report that an individual he did not know was banging on the door of his house. In response to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. RickSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- State v. LeathersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. UnderdahlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
- State v. ZaisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- State v. MaddausSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. ThonesavanhSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017