State v. Maddaus
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was indicted by the grand jury for the crime of larceny, tried in the district court for Hennepin county before Jelley, J., and a jury which found defendant guilty as charged in the indictment. From the order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBunn, J.
Defendant was found guilty of grand larceny in the second degree and appeals from the judgment of conviction and from an order refusing a new trial.
1. The first claim of defendant on this appeal is that the evidence was insufficient to sustain the verdict of guilty. The evidence produced by the state tended to show the following facts: William Buchholtz, on July 26, 1916, owned a Ford automobile. He -drove it to his place of employment, on Second avenue south between Tenth and Eleventh streets, in Minneapolis, on the morning of that day and left it parked *250across the street. He placed a chain…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. SauerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1888
- State v. AmesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- State v. HutchisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. ThonesavanhSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- People v. AlamoNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
- State v. McTagueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
- State v. GreenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
- Great American Mutual Indemnity Co. v. MeyerOhio Court of Appeals · 1924
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.