Legal Opinion

State v. Rossignol

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 30, 1993PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLASSMAN, Justice.

Terri Rossignol appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Penobscot County, Smith, J.), affirming the judgment of the District Court (Newport, Mills, J.), on her conditional plea of guilty pursuant to M.R.Crim.P. 11(a)(2) to the offense of operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicating liquor (OUI), 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312-B (Pamph.1992). We agree with Rossignol’s contention that the District Court erred in denying her motion to suppress evidence of her statements to police officer Richard K. Fowler, and accordingly, we vacate the judgment.

The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Pennsylvania v. MunizSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. United States v. Victor Montano DislaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. HollowaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
  2. State v. GrantSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008
  3. In the Interest of DflSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  4. State v. BrannSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  5. State v. RossignolSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API