Legal Opinion

State v. Rossignol

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 1, 1995PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATHEN, Chief Justice.

Defendant Terri Rossignol appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Penobscot County, Chandler, J.) affirming her conviction, in the District Court (Newport, Russell, J.), for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of intoxicating liquor. 29 M.R.S.A. § 1312 (Pamph.1994). Defendant contends that the trial court abused its discretion by ordering her to appear at trial, thereby permitting the in-court identification of her by a State’s witness. Defendant also asserts that there is insuffi- eient evidence to support her conviction. We affirm the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Noyes v. NoyesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  2. State v. KenneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
  3. State v. RossignolSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  4. State v. TempestaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
  5. State v. LapointeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. HayesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  2. State v. RandleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1999
  3. State v. MaloneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  4. State v. ButlerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
  5. State of Maine v. Douglas E. BelhumeurSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API