Woodbury v. Bruckner
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ON REMAND
Before: Griffin, P.J., and Gage and Owens * , JJ. Griffin, RJ.
On remand from the Supreme Court, we reconsider an order granting summary disposition in favor of defendants pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(10). After doing so, we again reverse and remand.
i
In reviewing the grant of summary disposition under MCR 2.116(C)(10), we assess the substantively admissible evidence in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion. Maiden v Rozwood, 461 Mich 109, 119-121; 597 NW2d 817 (1999); Bullock v Automobile Club of Michigan, 432 Mich 472, 474-475; 444 NW2d 114 (1989). In her brief on…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Maiden v. RozwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Moning v. AlfonoMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Lugo v. Ameritech Corp., Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2001
- Riddle v. McLouth Steel Products Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
- Bertrand v. Alan Ford, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- O'DONNELL v. GarasicMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
- Wellman v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2002
- Chadwick Detrick v. Heidtman Steel Prods.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Karres v. Allied Development Company, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022
- Lee Anne L Sundberg v. Oberstar IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2020
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.