Legal Opinion

In Re Steele

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided January 11, 2007No. 04-BG-429PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The Board on Professional Responsibility recommends that we impose reciprocal discipline on Eugene H. Steele in the form of a public censure, the functional equivalent of the public reprimand approved by the Supreme Court of Florida. Although respondent has filed exceptions to the Board’s Report, and a brief in opposition, we accept the Board’s recommendation.

I

On April 4, 2003, the Supreme Court of Florida ordered that respondent receive a public reprimand. That disciplinary proceeding arose out of respondent’s representation of a friend in a dispute over the cost of dental work. After a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. In Re ZdravkovichDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. In Re HoldmannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. In Re MacCiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re FullerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. In Re GrossmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. In Re WeekesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. In Re ZukoffDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. In re Chester W. NosalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API