In Re Steele
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
The Board on Professional Responsibility recommends that we impose reciprocal discipline on Eugene H. Steele in the form of a public censure, the functional equivalent of the public reprimand approved by the Supreme Court of Florida. Although respondent has filed exceptions to the Board’s Report, and a brief in opposition, we accept the Board’s recommendation.
I
On April 4, 2003, the Supreme Court of Florida ordered that respondent receive a public reprimand. That disciplinary proceeding arose out of respondent’s representation of a friend in a dispute over the cost of dental work. After a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re ZilberbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1992
- In Re ZdravkovichDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re HoldmannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re MacCiDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re FullerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re GrossmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In Re WeekesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- In Re ZukoffDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- In re Chester W. NosalDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.