Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Horine

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 8, 1989No. 71339PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERTSON, Judge.

The issue in this case is whether a landowner who is a party in a condemnation action may recover consequential damages to his land even though those damages are the product of the taking of land owned by other condemnees in the same condemnation action. Appellants assign error to the trial court instructing the jury not to consider evidence of diminished market value to the appellants’ properly that may result from an increased likelihood of flooding following the construction of the new Route 210. The Court of Appeals, Western District, reversed and remanded. A dissenting…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. City of St. Louis v. VasquezSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
  2. City of St. Louis v. Paramount Shoe Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. KAMO Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. BakerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  4. Owen v. City of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  5. City of St. Louis v. KislingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Heins Implement Co. v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. Byrom v. Little Blue Valley Sewer DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  3. State Ex Rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Jim Lynch Toyota, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Clay v. Missouri Highway & Transportation CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. State Ex Rel. Missouri Highway & Transportation Commission v. Modern Tractor & Supply Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API