Legal Opinion

People v. Taylor

California Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 2004No. S112443PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BROWN, J.

A defendant shoots a woman, killing her. As a result, her fetus also dies. In the absence of evidence the defendant knew the woman was pregnant, may the defendant be held liable for the second degree implied malice murder of the fetus? We conclude he may, and therefore reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeal.

I. Facts and Procedural Background

The following facts are taken largely from the Court of Appeal opinion. Defendant Harold Wayne Taylor and the victim, Ms. Patty Pansier, met in the spring of 1997. They dated and then lived together along with Fansler’s three children.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Keeler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. People v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
  3. People v. DennisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. BlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. People v. LoeunCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. People v. ChiuCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  2. People v. KnollerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  3. People v. MarlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  4. In re HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  5. People v. CalderonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API