Legal Opinion

Disciplinary Counsel v. Dann

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 2012No. 2011-2026PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

{¶ 1} Respondent, Marc Edward Dann of Cleveland, Ohio, Attorney Registration No. 0039425, was admitted to the practice of law in Ohio in 1987. In March 2004, we publicly reprimanded Dann for handling a legal matter without adequate preparation. Mahoning Cty. Bar Assn. v. Dann, 101 Ohio St.3d 266, 2004-Ohio-716, 804 N.E.2d 428. 1

{¶ 2} Finding that Dann engaged in conduct that adversely reflects on his fitness to practice law by soliciting improper compensation and filing false financial disclosures while serving as the Ohio attorney general, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Stark Cty. Bar Assn. v. ButtacavoliOhio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. BroerenOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. O'NeillOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. SteinOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Ohio State Bar Ass'n v. WeaverOhio Supreme Court · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. In re KlineSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  2. Disciplinary Counsel v. HaleOhio Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. BellOhio Supreme Court · 2024
  4. Discipline of RavnsborgSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Disciplinary Counsel v. Bennett.Ohio Supreme Court · 2018

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API