Legal Opinion

Cleveland Bar Ass'n v. Stein

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 9, 1972No. D. D. No. 71-4PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Per curiam

Failure of an attorney to timely file his income tax return constitutes a violation of Canon 29 and Canon 32 of the Canons of Professional Ethics, and also violates Rule XVIII(5) (a) of the Rules of Practice of this court.

Canon 29, entitled “Upholding the Honor of the Profession,” reads, in part:

• <<* * * He should strive at all times to uphold the honor and to maintain the dignity of the profession * * *.”

*80Canon 32, entitled “The Lawyer’s Duty in Its Last Analysis,” reads, in part:

“* * * He must also observe and advise his client to observe the statute law * *

Rule XVIII, entitled…

2Cited by57 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WalmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. LivsheeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  3. Disciplinary Counsel v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Disciplinary Counsel v. DannOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. SpradlingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API